Denver, CO
04.18.2007
http://origin.wwwgpoaccess.gov/legacy/
Initial Steps
Digital Demonstration Project = July 2006
slides too fast here
Questions about scope to be digitization / metadata schema
Katrina access "good enough" for now, and replace with preservation copy later?
? Best if there's a tangible back-up. Also if value is primarily in the content, not the format.
Barbie, U Virginia role to authenticate preservation-standard-level items digitized by other institutions.
Rick Davis seemed agreeable to that.
Bill Suddoth is the GPO digital registry looked at for giving CPO a sense of what's already out there?
Rick Davis seek to expand that registry. Need as SPO to be more proactive in soliciting participation.
Katrina it's broken and hard to update.
AR We need best possible accessibility. We can preserve look/feel or rare documents by other means.
Hemphill Content over character.
Evelyn Subject specialists can determine if specific documents need to be archivaly preserved for historical value.
Jeff, MO No.
Evelyn Access copy may not be good enough.
Katrina Yes, but it may not be GPO's responsibility to do it (value-added). Too much as a standard for GPO. Usable numeric data would be good.
Steve Hayes, ND Need to be careful. Look to the marketplace. Minimum to read it; we have a lot of unreadable microfische. Standard needs to be defined very carefully.
missing end of conversation
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |