|
EDHE6500_20081113
Page history
last edited
by PBworks 15 years, 5 months ago
EDHE 6500
11.13.2008
Overview of Dissertation
Chapter 1
- the issue
- my problem/question
- "so what?"
- SUMMARY of what I did and found (what I'm going to do)
- a lot of people will only read the first chapter--about ten pages of what you did and why
Chapter 2
- what do we know?
- how do we know it?
- what don't we know? (the set-up for your study)
- you don't want this to be an annotated bibliography; find some way to organize it; historical periods, elements of your question, schools of thought--break it into several thematic sections (2 - 5 sections)
- very brief: a few paragraphs to a page on very relevant works--others get brief 1-2 sentence mentions; "Blah Blah supports this idea as well, etc."
- average # of references? 70 or 80--can be good with only 25 or bad with 100
- find out what are any limitations of previous methodologies
Chapter 3
- what I did (how you investigated the question)
- make it explicit--so the quality can be examined, and so they can replicate the research
- for the proposal, you'll have the first free chapters, but chapter 3 will be written in the future tense "this is what I WILL do"
- change the tense after proposal
Chapter 4
- this is what I found
- NOTE: qualitative dissertations often break this chapter into two chapters, for a six-chapter format (instead of 5 chapters)--moves from raw data to thematic finding
Chapter 5
- what it means
- what we still need to know (further research questions)
Common Dissertation Mistakes
- failure to examine the relevant literature
- examining business lit without looking at educational lit--look broadly, at a couple of fields outside of education
- failure to understand the difference between research and popular lit
- failure to examine the lit for research methods and further questions
- need to see how people made inquiry into those questions
- will help you refine your own research methods
- be able to critique the lit in terms of its value
- failure to "own" the project
- this has to be your work
- you have to have enough interest in and confidence in the significance of your research to stand up for it
- unwillingness to consider advice
- thin line between failure to own and bullheadedness
- dissertation as an effort to "prove" a point of view
- you have to be objective in your research
- poor selection of committee members
- need to be able to work well with your chair (or change them)
- don't select your committee before selecting your chair--they have to work together
- you want your chair to help select or approve your committee members
- not allowing sufficient time to complete the project
- good rule of thumb: multiply time by 3
- failure to multitask
- multitask--do more than one track on your dissertation at one time--don't be sequential or every delay delays the entire project
- failure to secure IRB approval or understand human subject issues
- procrastination and perfectionism
- attempt to use the advisor as a fundamental editor
- good to use chair as a methodologial editor
- they won't want to correct all of your grammar, at this level
- hire an editor, if necessary
- trying to do the "easy" dissertation
- it's the faculty's job to make it harder
- pick something that you're interested in--but it needs to be doable in the given time frame
- don't do something that is so huge and "important" that it chokes you or takes a long time
- this is not your life's work--this is your ticket to the show
- once you finish it, then you begin your life's work
- but write something you're not ashamed to put your name to
- failure to identify and support the "so what?" of a study
- failure to get the study into the literature after completion
- should be publishable in some format or another
- adapt to journal format (or presentation, paper, etc.)
- Dr. Cutright expects a print piece within one year of graduation, with himself as second author
- could also be a book--multiple projects can come out of it
- also practitioner pieces
- having a PhD or EdD isn't just a privilege, it's an obligation to share what you know
General Class Discussion
- discussing Foster & Cone (book on thesis/dissertation)
- ASHE was excellent (Baaska & Peggy went)
- a lot of networking and discussing research
- presentations about policy and practice
- financial policies, how to use databases, etc.
- acceptance is pretty tough there (Peggy presented with another student)
- discussion of GRE scores vs. holistic admissions
- also comprehensive exams and more real-world alternatives
- when you're in orals, you have to be strong in your convictions--you're going to be an administrator in higher education
- can you handle pressure?
- ultimately, the faculty's objective is to see you succeed--but they have to push you
- discussion of our third (and final) reflection papers
- you deal with the enormity of the dissertation by breaking it down into discrete tasks
- if you're doing a qualitative dissertation, you need to find a committee chair that is experienced in qualitative research (or very friendly to it)
- if you can't get a copy of someone's dissertation, email the author and request an electronic copy--they are usually happy to provide you with it
EDHE6500_20081113
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.